포스트포드주의

읽을거리

• Charles F. Sabel and Jonathan Zeitlin, "Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets, and Technology in the 19th-century Industrialization," Past and Present 108 1985: 133-76.
• Michael Nuwer, "From Batch to Flow: Production Technology and Work-Force Skills in the Steel Industry," T&C 29 1988: 808-838.
• Philip Scranton, "Diversity in Diversity: Flexible Production and American Industrialization, 1880-1930," Business History Review 65 (1991), 27-90.
• Philip Scranton, "Manufacturing Diversity: Production Systems, Markets, and an American Consumer Society, 1870-1930," T&C 35 1994: 476-505.
• Regina Lee Blaszczyk, "Reign of the Robots: The Homer Laughlin China Company and Flexible Mass Production," T&C 36 1995: 863-911.
• Jonathan Zeitlin, "Flexibility and mass production at war: Aircraft manufacture in Britain, the United States, and Germany, 1939-1945," T&C 1995 36: 46-79.
• James Womack et al., The Machine That Changed the World (New York, 1990), pp. 17-69.

더 읽을거리

포스트 포디즘이나 유연한 생산은 기술사보다는 경제학, 경영학, 사회학, 지리학과 같은 사회과학 분야에서 많이 논의되는 개념들이다. 이러한 논의의 불을 지핀 저술은 Michael J. Piore and Charles F. Sabel, The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (New York: Basic Books, 1984)이다. P. Hirst and J. Zeitlin, "Flexible Specialization versus Post-Fordism: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications," in M. Storper and A. J. Scott eds., Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development (London: Routledge, 1992), pp. 70-115도 논의를 정리하는 데 유용하다. 최근의 연구 성과로는 Charles F. Sabel and J. Zeitlin eds., World of Possibilities: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997); Philip Scranton, Endless Novelty: Specialty Production and American Industrialization, 1865-1925 (Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1997) 등이 있다. E. J. Yanarella and H.G. Reid, "From 'Trained Gorilla' to 'Humanware': Repoliticizing the Body-machine Complex between Fordism and Post-Fordism," in Social and Political Body ed. by Theodore R. Schatzki and Wolfgang Natter (New York, Guilford Press, 1996), pp.181-219는 탈포드주의의 신화를 비판한다.